Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment
What could the presence of both unionized and non-unionized divisions within the Jones Company be interpreted as?
A. Secondary change
B. Ally division
C. Alter Ego
D. Double-breasting
The correct answer is: D. Double-breasting
The presence of both unionized and non-unionized divisions within the Jones Company can be interpreted as double-breasting. Double-breasting refers to a practice where an employer operates two separate divisions: one that is unionized and one that is non-unionized. This situation often arises in industries where an organization may want to offer competitive pricing while also balancing labor costs and flexibility. By maintaining both types of divisions, the company can potentially leverage the advantages of unionized labor, such as collective bargaining benefits, while also having a non-unionized segment that might operate with fewer restrictions and lower costs associated with labor contracts. This arrangement serves a strategic purpose, allowing the organization to navigate various market demands while managing labor relations. In contrast, the other terms listed—secondary change, ally division, and alter ego—do not accurately characterize the aspect of maintaining both unionized and non-unionized operations. Secondary change typically refers to amendments related to unions or labor organization, ally division indicates cooperative relations between different entities, and alter ego often relates to distinct conditions affecting legal recognition between different divisions. These concepts do not encapsulate the specific operational strategy represented by having one unionized and one non-unionized division within a single company.